Back to Workflows

Post-Production Studio Streamlining VFX with Frame.io and Flame

Company Situation

The company operates within the post-production visual effects and finishing sector, supporting editorial workflows with a small, specialized team that includes senior flame artists and VFX leads. Their setup involves a focused group of about five core users managing active projects with intensive review and approval needs.

Existing Workflow

Currently, the team relies heavily on Frame.io for review, approval, and version control workflows integrated with tools like Flame and Premiere. They use Frame.io’s API primarily for automatic asset uploading and importing comments directly into timelines. For file storage and sharing beyond Frame.io, they utilize a self-hosted file management solution called FileRun. Their projects typically involve around 2-5TB of active storage, all tied to Frame.io version 3.

Issues with the Existing Workflow

The company faces several critical pain points with their existing Frame.io setup: High Cost: Frame.io’s enterprise API access requires a minimum of 10 seats, doubling the number of users they actually need and inflating their annual spend significantly beyond their needs. Lack of Admin Flexibility: Frame.io does not offer a dedicated non-user admin account, forcing the company to purchase expensive user seats just for administrative purposes. Version Upgrade Concerns: They are hesitant to upgrade to Frame.io version 4 due to potential API incompatibilities that could disrupt their custom integrations. Limited Feature Set for Their Needs: While Frame.io covers review and approval, it lacks the broader combination of services the company is interested in, such as integrated storage management and more cost-effective API usage.

How Shade Would Change Their Workflow

Shade offers a compelling alternative that addresses the company’s core issues by: - Providing flexible API access without forcing an inflated seat count, thus lowering overall costs. - Offering user licenses at a significantly more affordable price point (between $240 and $576 per user annually), including for administrative roles. - Combining multiple functionalities—such as review and approval, file storage, and automation—in one platform, reducing reliance on multiple tools like Frame.io and FileRun. - Ensuring compatibility and stability for API integrations, alleviating concerns about disruptive version upgrades. This integrated approach would streamline their creative review and asset management workflows, reduce overhead costs, and provide the flexibility needed for their specialized post-production environment.

Benefits

  • Significant cost savings on API and user licensing fees
  • Reduced administrative overhead with affordable admin-level access
  • Consolidation of review, approval, and storage workflows into a single platform
  • Stability and confidence in API integration compatibility
  • Flexibility to scale user seats precisely to team size without unnecessary extras