Back to Workflows
Post-Production Firm Operating with Remote Editors and Designers
Company Situation
The company operates a post-production company with a remote workforce composed of editors, colorists, and motion designers. Originally maintaining a physical office, the company transitioned to a fully remote setup to reduce overhead costs and leverage flexible work environments. The team is relatively small, involving about eight active users, including partners and creative staff, collaborating on complex media projects.
Existing Workflow
The company’s current setup includes a local server environment running on a Kinect device and multiple machines (Windows and Mac Mini) hosted from a home office. For remote collaboration, they previously relied on multiple disconnected services such as LucidLink for mounted cloud storage, Frame.io for media review and approval, and VPNs. File sharing and communication were handled through platforms like Google Drive, Dropbox, and WhatsApp (recently migrated to Slack). Media assets include large proxy files, trimmed camera files from RED and RLX cameras, and OMF exports for audio teams, typically managed in DaVinci Resolve and After Effects.
Issues with the Existing Workflow
The company faced several challenges with their workflow:
High latency and poor performance with newer versions of LucidLink, especially due to reliance on distant Amazon servers instead of local data centers, which impacted editing speed and responsiveness.
High operational costs, including energy costs associated with running local machines and subscription fees for multiple cloud services like LucidLink and Frame.io, totaling up to $700-$800 monthly.
Complexity and inefficiency caused by juggling multiple tools for storage, review, metadata tagging, and file sharing.
Difficulty in managing backup storage, relying heavily on physical hard drives, which added management overhead and risk.
Fragmented communication and project coordination due to reliance on disparate sharing platforms, complicating the workflow for editors, colorists, and finishing artists.
How Shade Would Change Their Workflow
Shade offers an integrated platform that consolidates cloud storage, mounted drives, media review and approval, metadata tagging, and archiving into a single solution. For this company, Shade would:
- Replace multiple tools with one unified system, reducing complexity and operational costs.
- Provide efficient mounted storage with low latency, improving remote editing experiences even with international server locations.
- Enable easy sharing of proxy and trimmed media files via secure shareable links, simplifying collaboration across editors, colorists, and finishing artists.
- Offer flexible pricing with on-demand active storage (around 2 terabytes) and cost-effective archiving options, reducing reliance on physical hard drives and lowering total storage expenses.
- Centralize communications and workflows by integrating file sharing with metadata tagging and review, streamlining project management and reducing time spent on administrative tasks.
Benefits
- Significant cost savings by consolidating multiple cloud services into one platform.
- Improved remote editing performance with lower latency access to media files.
- Simplified workflow with integrated review, approval, and metadata management.
- Reduced hardware dependency and backup complexity through cloud archival storage.
- Enhanced collaboration and communication efficiency across a geographically distributed team.
- Scalable storage options tailored to active project needs and archival requirements.
Want to see how Shade can improve your workflow?
Book a Demo