Back to Workflows
Digital Media Company Streamlining Cloud and NAS Collaboration
Company Situation
The company operates within the digital media production space, focusing on podcasting, documentary-style content, and episodic YouTube videos. Their team setup includes a full-time editor and additional freelance editors depending on seasonal demand. The volume of content is substantial, producing hundreds of videos each month across multiple formats and companies, including specialized tiers of podcast editing and tourism-related video content for a regional market.
Existing Workflow
Currently, the company manages media storage and transfers predominantly through Google Drive, leveraging a legacy high-capacity Gmail account for cloud storage. Edited content is delivered to companies via Frame IO, which functions as the final review and approval platform. The company also uses a Synology NAS for remote editing storage but found it complex and has moved away from it. Notifications about new uploads are managed through integrations like Zapier. For B-roll footage, the company stores assets separately on OneDrive. Editors access unedited footage in Google Drive while companies only see final versions on Frame IO, maintaining separation of raw and finished content.
Issues with the Existing Workflow
Uploading and downloading large media files through Google Drive is cumbersome and inefficient, impacting editing turnaround times.
The company desires a more streamlined, centralized platform for sharing footage with editors without exposing unedited content to companies.
Management and searchability of extensive B-roll libraries are limited, with assets scattered across different services like OneDrive.
Google Drive’s browser-based upload process is seen as inconvenient compared to a native desktop experience.
Existing NAS-based workflows are too complex and do not provide sufficient ease of use or integration with remote teams.
Frame IO is reserved for final company delivery, so raw footage and editing collaboration happen in less integrated environments, causing workflow fragmentation.
How Shade Would Change Their Workflow
Shade would serve as a unified platform to manage the entire editing workflow—from raw footage upload and editor collaboration through to final company delivery. By centralizing media storage and transfer within Shade, the company could:
- Upload and organize all project assets, including B-roll, in one place with advanced metadata tagging and search capabilities, enabling editors to quickly find and use the correct clips.
- Control permissions effectively so editors access only the necessary raw footage, while companies view only the approved content, maintaining content security and workflow clarity.
- Replace the cumbersome Google Drive upload/download process with a more seamless, desktop-integrated experience, improving efficiency and reducing friction.
- Potentially consolidate storage and collaboration tools, simplifying notifications and file transfers without the need for additional automation services like Zapier.
- Leverage Shade’s creative technology background to support high-volume, remote editing teams with improved version control and collaboration features.
Benefits
- Centralized media storage and sharing for raw and final content
- Enhanced search and metadata tagging for faster asset retrieval
- Clear separation of editor and company permissions to secure sensitive footage
- Streamlined upload process with native desktop integration
- Reduced workflow complexity by consolidating multiple tools into one platform
- Improved collaboration capabilities for remote editing teams
- Scalable to handle high-volume video production workflows
Technologies Used
Want to see how Shade can improve your workflow?
Book a Demo